Comments on: Catching Fire – Audio

By: Regge Doll

Regge Doll — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:25:41 +0000

mmmm. . . Yes. The second book Hunger Games. After enjoying the first game, I had high hopes for the second. Soon it was clear that the fire be not caught, the action and excitement was the first of many. Indeed, under fire, never really took to me to start slowly, as a rule a book at the beginning and the end I am taken from her, but failed to ignite this attraction. Why? First, start writing too much annoying, there is not a single paragraph, without the main character in space and reflect on a strong thinking, feeling and emotion. There was not much that in the first book, but the plot and action has helped take my mind off it during this time in the second book there is no distraction. Seemed very soon his diary when the reading of a daughter, Suzanne Collins.Deuxièmement newspaper that caught fire is similar to the first person he has already seen more as the film Deja Vu, with Denzel Washington. I can not write the closest resemblance to my post, because that would rob. The book is not something that can really stand out from the first. Both books are so similar, the only difference is that the gravity of the second. When the first book was Dr. Evil, Mini Me.Troisièmement would ignite the love triangle between Gale and Petra Katniss is very flat and unrealistic. I can hardly call a triangular love story, because it seems that nobody really likes. It is acting almost like the three characters, and said her lover. Pretending as done for the citizens Katniss of the Capitol as they entered the Games hungry. Gale, Petra and Katniss seem to be faking their love, so we want to pay the people for bread Suzanne Collin, about his purchase livres.Au best it can be said to be a bridge, the series for the support last and last book, The Bridge of very fragile. I can imagine that many people go down, the bridge and never make the third book. In fact, Weith in thought and not the third book deserves to be read after the disaster literature. Rating: 1 / 5

By: Neurasthenic

Neurasthenic — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:39:40 +0000

Suzanne Collins is running a good story, and catch fire, like the hunger games, fun read, fast. It stars the same characters in the same framework, goals and challenges. But it is also its weakness. While it is normal, even expected, for the heroes of the epic return to the place of their first difficulties, in this case, the return is too fast and too similar, and suggests a lack of imagination. This is particularly disappointing because the game world hunger was a fascinating story, and developed the first novel in the trilogy, politics and economy in the world in addition to his “Battle Royale”. This seems to be an opportunity for a variety of adventures on the way to create revolution inevitable. Could we have a book together in the capital, or visit the districts or view Haymitch? Perhaps, but we are fighting back on the stage for another. Rating: 2 / 5

By: Brodie

Brodie — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:52:03 +0000

repetitive, no character development does not make sense, climate change, flat with a lack of substance that makes it so unbearable to the Cliffhanger, a new type of stuffing, I said repetitive? I know that Suzanne can do better, at least his publishers want. Rating: 2 / 5

By: BreakingDawnFAN

BreakingDawnFAN — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:00:27 +0000

I know it’s been a lot of good reviews, but I thought it was like the hunger games, but with a triangular love story on ice for the next book. I think the writing is large and the world created by the author is creative, but it lacks something for me! I loved the first few, because that’s when the first time ever. I have read the book again and maybe I’ll change my mind, but I expected more and maybe I was wrong. Rating: 2 / 5

By: C. R. Swanson

C. R. Swanson — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:23:56 +0000

I had serious problems with the first book in this series, “Hunger Games”. I thought it was a rip-off of banal “Battle Royale”, complete with nonsense, stereotypes of the premise, unworkable and a checklist for real science fiction most realistic future. My opinion of it remains inchangée.Heureusement, “Brand” is a little better, but only one peu.L history again with the end of the first book Katniss shows (how stupid) name and her boyfriend, Peeta () How stupid name, traveled Panem (what a stupid … Oh, you already know), during a tour victory. They are cleverly done stifle primarily at the local level have focused on the insurgency. Hmmm … around the incumbent government and the merits of killing large groups of children each year and, surprise, it is a rebellion? Major shock and only part of why the premise is fraught mistakes, but continuer.Finalement, he announced that there would a Big Super Hyper Mega Cool Games Hoc hunger this year, with some survivors of the old games, go to the competition. Guess who ends up choosing? In general the book is just a little boring. There are some interesting scenes, such Katniss meeting with the President and a nice moment with a wedding dress, but also some of the most interesting scenes fresh tires from the first book. Even the kick arrested, games are not so intéressant.Il is also a moral, this strange story. There is an enormous amount of violence in the book, because there has been much in the first (as we read it as any child under a certain age, and I’m surprised, Scholastic published this), but there was no sex at all. None. Katniss seventeen, and if at some point bolted toward the end of the book, as if she had her first orgasm. It is not permitted by the author to go to kill people, but must remain clear empty. Yeah, it’s me rolling eyes. Also funny, there are no rude words in m livre.Je “sure that the fans of the first book to wet your pants the opportunity to read it. I’m sure if he wanted to, they are so because a large part which is almost the same. Someone else, probably not. Rating: 3 / 5